Lesson Planning
InTASC Standard 7: The teacher plans instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon knowledge of content areas, curriculum, cross-disciplinary skills, and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of learners and the community context.
Introduction
The final step of the planning process consists of breaking down the information created in the long term and unit planning phases even further and developing daily lesson plans. By this point, I have invested a significant amount of time planning the unit from start to finish. Lesson planning is the stage where I think of how to make the previously designed learning targets and standards engaging for students.
Much like the previous phases of planning it is important to continually think about my class Vision and Big Goal as well as how I can incorporate multiple content areas, cross-disciplinary skills, and my students’ interests to effectively teach within the community in which I work.
Full Lesson Plan
The lesson plan on the left—designed to introduce the topic of atomic orbitals—takes place on day two in the Schedule of Lessons, which is located on the Unit Planning page. This document shows a general layout of the lesson and description of activities. Further elaboration on each section of the lesson and student work samples can be found below.
Atomic orbitals lesson plan
Pre-Planning
The first step of planning a lesson is to pull all of the necessary information from the long-term and unit plans. The document shown here lists the standards that will be covered in this specific lesson and how the lesson connects to the course Vision and Big Goal.
Before planning the lesson activities, I also think about the prerequisite knowledge a student must have to master the daily objectives as well as how a diagnostic will be used to check for this knowledge.
Initial pre-planning for lesson
Lesson assessments and key points
The next step of pre-planning is to think through the ways student knowledge will be assessed during and after the lesson. Backwards planning is important on a macro scale when unit planning and it is also important on a micro scale when planning individual lessons. We need to know where we are going before we can determine how we are going to get there.
Finally, I establish two to five key points for every lesson. “Effective teachers determine what they want their students to be able to leave the classroom being able to say, think or do” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 84). This is why key points are so important. The main new learning target for this lesson requires students to be able to identify each of the four major atomic orbitals. These four key points were selected to ensure students can identify each of the orbitals and can understand what they are identifying. Furthermore, when developing key points “you should not overwhelm or confuse your class with excessive information, nor should you skim over important ideas necessary for students to understand the content” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 84). The four key points, listed in the document on the left, were selected with this piece of information in mind—each building on the last to ensure proper student understanding without overwhelming them with information.
Lesson Opening
Communicating to students what they are going to learn, why it is important and how it relates to what has been done previously is the main purpose of the lesson opening (Teach for America, 2011). A verbal introduction of reading through the daily agenda, written on the whiteboard, in the front of the classroom, is used to begin this lesson with students.
Each lesson should start with a “hook” or a short introductory moment that captures the attention of the students (Lemov, 2010). There are many different ways to create a hook for a lesson. “Having the room set up in a different way when students enter, you will pique their interest immediately” (Teach for America, 2011, p.81). For this lesson, students enter class and there are balloons all over the room. They are informed that the balloons will be used during the lesson. This new piece of the classroom acts to make students curious from the moment they walk in the door and increases engagement.
Some teachers “start with problems or exercises they call a ‘Do Now’ or ‘Warm Up,” and students are expected to begin this activity when they come in the door” (Teach for America, 2011, p.81). In my chemistry class, students begin with a set of Catalyst questions daily. They know the expectation is to be in their seat working on the questions when the bell rings. Students typically have five minutes to complete the questions and then I will come around and check for completion. The document to the left shows several student samples of the catalyst from this lesson.
The final part of the lesson opening addresses the fact that it is important to “provide and model clear, high expectations of behavior (as to materials and activities)” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 81). Students are expected to have their organized chemistry binder out at the beginning of every period. This binder contains all notes and assignments we have completed in our class so far and allows students to easily reference back to old materials when necessary.
Catalyst student samples
Introduction of New Material
The bulk of this lesson is composed of introduction of new material and guided practice. It is important to use multiple methods when presenting information to students for the first time. Two common methods that can be used are modeling and lecture (Teach for America, 2011). Both of these methods are used in this lesson. The guided notes and PowerPoint act as a lecture. I also create a model of each atomic orbital out of balloons before students create their own model to act as a visual representation of what is being discussed. Finally, at the end of the lesson, students watch video discussing the atomic orbitals so students can hear the new information discussed a different way by a second person in order to deepen understanding.
The slideshow below is projected on the SMARTboard in the front of my classroom during the lesson. To establish a sense of routine and consistency, my daily PowerPoint presentations always look fairly similar. They start with a catalyst, new information is provided in the same format as on students’ guided notes, visuals are provided, and there is an exit ticket at the end. Having consistent slides also allows students who are absent to easily make up work. I can either print off a copy of the slides to go through with students or they can access them through my online grade book, Schoology, if they have access to technology at home.
Slideshow presentation used during lesson
Guided notes student sample
“Graphic organizers…give students a structure in which to take notes” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 85). Guided notes—like the student sample in the document on the left—are provided to students whenever direct instruction occurs in my class. These have been very beneficial for many students. Guided notes consist of fill in the blank sentences or a full graphic organizer depending on the lesson and the specific student. This allows students to maximize their attention while taking notes. Instead of having to write down all the information, they can copy down a few key terms, while spending the majority of the time listening and looking at provided visuals.
There are several different types of questions I ask to hold student attention—fact-based, objective-based, reflective, interpretive, and conclusion-driven (Teach for America, 2011). Throughout direct instruction, I ask these various types of questions to students. Each student has his or her name written on a Popsicle stick. When a check for understanding is asked, students are given some time to independently think. After a certain amount of time, a Popsicle stick is drawn to give students the opportunity to answer the question. This holds all students accountable and ensures everyone is trying to formulate an answer because they do not know if they will be called or not. If they do not know the answer a second Popsicle stick is drawn. These types of checks for understandings are important so I can identify gaps in knowledge and adjust my instruction, in real time, if necessary.
“You always need to give students plenty of time and opportunities to engage with and practice the key ideas” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 87). For this reason, this lesson is designed to alternate between direct instruction and group practice. A new concept is introduced then students are immediately given the opportunity to practice using the new concept. Then we return to direct instruction and so on. In Instructional planning & delivery four different types of learners are discussed. Visual learners learn from what they see. Auditory learners learn from hearing concepts spoken aloud. Tactile learners need to experience new information through touch. Finally, kinesthetic learners need to learn through movement and experiences (Teach for American, 2011). There is a part of this lesson designed for each of these four different categories of learners. The concept of atomic orbitals can be difficult to comprehend when it is first introduced so we will discuss it in as many ways as possible. Each of the four types of learners will have a section of the lesson tailed to their specific learning style.
Guided Practice
“The Guided Practice stage is where teachers share the reins – gauging student practice of the new material and clarifying steps and points” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 88). New information was presented in the guided notes section described above. This lesson is designed to alternate between the presentation of new information and guided practice. A small piece of information is presented through lecture and modeling and then students work with a partner to practice using a manipulative to use the information. Then we return to notes for more new information—then students use manipulative again and so on.

s orbital

p orbital

Three p orbitals

d orbital
Based on previous experience, students have difficulty conceptualizing atomic orbitals. In middle school science classes as well as popular culture, atoms are generally represented through Bohr’s planetary model. This representation shows a nucleus of protons and neutrons with electrons orbiting around in set orbits. Students also have many other examples they can think of in regards to orbits—such as the planets around the sun. This is the image that has been taught and the image they are used to. The quantum mechanical model presents a challenge for instruction for these reasons. Students have to change their entire conceptual understanding of how the atom is structured. The electrons are not circling in fixed orbits. Instead they occupy orbitals—a region of space, which an electron is likely to occupy. Orbitals incorporate probability—a concept which many of my students have little to no experience with. An orbital does not tell you the specific location of an electron. Rather it tells you the area of space that an electron most likely occupies at any given time. There are also four primary orbitals—s, p, d, and f—each with different shapes and capacity to hold electrons. These orbitals can occupy the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis. Many of my students lack foundational math and graphing skills. They have major gaps in knowledge in this content area. Many do not know which is the x-axis and which is the y-axis. Also the majority of 10th grade students have never been exposed to the z-axis in their math classes yet. Orbitals are also a 3-dimensional space but are frequently represented by diagrams on paper. Another mental block for students—similar to the majority of concepts in chemistry—is that atomic orbitals are too small to actually see. We can diagram them but we cannot physically see them. All of these reasons, in combination, make mastering a conceptual understanding of atomic orbitals difficult for many students. For this reason, the guided practice portion of this lesson aims to give students a hands-on experience “building” atomic orbitals that they can physically see and touch.
In this section of the lesson, students—working with their purposefully assigned table partners—construct representations of atomic orbitals out of balloons. We cover one of the four primary orbitals (described in the “Introduction to New Material” section above) and then students have the opportunity to “build” the orbital. While students are constructing their models, I can circulate the room answering questions as necessary. I can also ensure that all students are building their models correctly. There are embed frequent check for understanding questions to ask groups while I walk around. When every partner pair has a properly constructed model, we can move on to the next orbital. Through this step-by-step process, I can make sure no student is falling behind and we are all progressing at the same pace. “A common and dangerous mistake during the Guided Practice phase of the lesson cycle is to allow one student to serve as a representative for the entire class, leaving the rest of the students without adequate engagement with the material” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 89). This lesson was designed to ensure all students are required to think and participate. When designing this activity, I realized there could be an issue with accountability. It was entirely possible that one student in the partner pair would build the entire model and the other partner would be left not understanding. Multiple colors of balloons are used to solve this issue and increase accountability. The partner with the longer hair is given only black balloons. The partner with the shorter hair is given only while balloons. Each model involves blowing up, tying off, and connecting two or more balloons. Students are required to alternate which color of balloon they add to their model. Students are also not allowed to tie on a balloon that is not their color. This allows me to ensure all students are participating. Models should be a mix of black and white balloons. I should also never see one of the partners using the color balloon that was not assigned to them. This activity relates directly to the selected Common Core State Standards, which requires collaboration between students.
Problems during a lesson should be scaffolded from easy to more difficult (Teach for America, 2011). During this lesson, students start by using a single balloon to construct the circular sphere of the “s” orbital. This is a fairly easy mental picture for students to create even without a model. By the end of the lesson students are constructing the significantly more difficult shape of three “p” orbitals together, which uses many balloons and utilizes the concepts of the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis.
Before students begin to build each balloon model I verbally remind them of the lesson objective because it is important to be clear how an activity aligns to the daily objective (Teach for America, 2011).
The main purpose of Guided Practice is to allow student a safe environment to practice using their new knowledge and skills (Teach for America, 2011). I can constantly monitor student progress, correcting misconceptions, and reteaching as necessary to clear up any confusion. Each atomic orbital model acts as a type of formative assessment. I can easily determine if students correctly comprehended the desired atomic orbital. If they did not build the structure correctly, I can demonstrate and close gaps in knowledge. “Checks for Understanding are a critical component of every step of your lesson plan” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 93). For this reason, CFUs have been incorporated as frequently as possible during this lesson.
This lesson was also designed to operate through the system of “I do,” “we do,” “you do” (Lemov, 2010). At first, I show the student the atomic orbital. I have a pre-built model to show them—I do. Then we walk through building the orbital as a class—we do. Finally, students work with their partner to build their own model—you do.
Independent Practice

“The Independent Practice phase occurs when students refine their skills without teacher assistance, and can be the time when students demonstrate their understanding of the objective through completing a formative assessment” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 94). This activity should be directly related to the DOK level of the objective. The objective for this unit contains a DOK level one verb—“identify.” For this reason, students only need to identify the orbitals in order to reach the stated objective. The bulk of this lesson had students speaking to each other in a collaborative activity. The independent practice portion of this lesson consists of 5 minutes of silent time and students use the whiteboards from their table. Each student comes to the front of the room and draws a piece of paper out of a bucket—pictured on the left. The piece of paper contains a picture of two of the four atomic orbitals—there are several different combinations possible—and the name of two orbitals. Students return to their desk and identify the orbitals in the pictures they selected. This directly relates to the lesson objective. Then students sketch a picture of the orbital names they selected—this is scaffolded above the level required by the desired objective. During this time, I can walk around the room to check students’ whiteboards to see if students are correctly answering their questions and provide immediate feedback from the informal data collected.
It is important to “allot the majority of instructional time to the activities that best promote student mastery of the objective” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 97). The guided practice portion of this lesson is significantly more beneficial for student understanding. Constructing models of each orbital will give students the opportunity to use hands-on manipulative to get a better mental picture of what is being discussed. For this reason, the majority of the lesson was allocated to that activity. This learning target does not lend itself easily to independent practice so only a short amount of time was given to this section.
Slips of paper used in independent practice activity
Closing
A lesson closing should have two main components—reinforcing the lesson objectives and an opportunity to check student understanding (Teach for America, 2011). The video described below will act to reinforce lesson objectives of identifying the atomic orbitals. The exit ticket acts as a way to check student understanding.
Students watch a short 2 minute and 30 second YouTube video to show the atomic orbitals and explain the principle energy levels again. This acts to restate the lesson objective and key points. “Students have interests related to content, the social dynamics of grouping strategies, and the liveliness and pace of the instruction” (Teach for America, 2011, p. 137). It is important to take these interests into account while planning a lesson. Students have repeatedly told me they enjoy when I show videos—regardless of the length—in class. They said they like how it breaks up the lesson and gives them something to watch. Several students have told me that they are used to watching TV and movies so this is a method they are used to learning from. For this reason, I try to show short videos to reinforce topics as often as possible.
The DOK level used in the lesson objectives for this lesson is relatively low. For this reason, the rigor and DOK levels used in the exit ticket—shown in the document on the left—are on the same level. The majority of the lesson was spent in their collaborative grouping structures and students could rely on their classmates to fill in any gaps of understanding. The exit ticket will be an individual assessment to check individual understanding. Also, while the notes and presentation were written down, the bulk of this lesson was a hands-on visual activity. The exit ticket will act to ensure students can take the information from the hands-on activity and synthesize it into writing. This exit ticket is graded and returned—with feedback—next class. Even though this exit ticket is relatively short and requires low-level thinking, valuable data can still be obtained from it (Lemov, 2010).
Exit ticket student samples
Reflection
Overall, I would consider this lesson a success. Over 90% of students answered all four questions on the exit ticket correctly. Also most students correctly answered the questions during the independent practice activity.
Moving forward, there are a few things I would change about this lesson for the next time it is implemented. This lesson took place on a Thursday and Friday according to our block schedule. Classes are shorter on Monday and Friday due to our advisory period. While the lesson was timed perfectly for the shorter classes on Friday, there was extra time on Thursday. I improvised a balloon volleyball activity to fill the final ten minutes of class. Students were divided into two teams and went to opposite sides of the table that is in the center of my room. The goal was to volley the balloons—one of each model—back and forth across the table and not let them touch the ground. In volleyball, it is important to call out “mine” if you are going to hit the ball so multiple players do not collide while trying to get to the same volley. I used this concept and modified it for “orbital volleyball.” Instead of calling “mine,” students had to call out the name of the specific orbital they were about to hit. If they said the wrong name—or dropped the model—they were eliminated. The last team with a player remaining won. Having extra time left over ended up being a pleasant mistake because this activity was fun and was a way for students to drill the names and shapes of the orbitals. I aim to modify this activity for next year and incorporate it into the actual lesson plan.
Furthermore, I need to incorporate a stretch activity for my GATE students. While orbitals are a difficult concept for most students to grasp, I had three students immediately understand the information. Next time I do this lesson, I need to develop an activity to give to these students to push them to reach a deeper level of mastery.
This turned out to be one of my favorite lessons and I received a lot of positive feedback from students on the end of unit reflection. I will definitely use a similar lesson to teach this concept in the future.
References
“2016 Science Framework.” 2016 Science Framework – Curriculum Frameworks (CA Dept of Education), www.cde.ca.gov/ci/sc/cf/scifwprepubversion.asp.
Denton, P. (2008). The power of our words. Educational Leadership, 66(1), 28–31.
Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Jones, K. A., Vermette, P. J., & Jones, J. L. (2009). An integration of “backwards planning” unit design with the “two-step” lesson planning framework. Education, 130(2), 357–360.
Lemov, D. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Marzano, R. (2006). Classroom Assessment & Grading That Work.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Teach For America. (2011). Instructional planning & delivery. Retrieved fromhttps://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9aKdxaTnscyZmZ4aVh5Wnd4aG8/view?pli=1
Teach For America (Executive Producer). (2005). Relentless road tracking system. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/teachforamerica.org/tfa-teacher-video-archive/jhu